lava-users

lava-users@lists.lavasoftware.org

3 participants
927 discussions

How to install 2021.10 "Lava-dispatcher" now

by koti

Hi, I plan to install the 2021.10 lava-dispatcher instead of the 2021.11 latest version. I am unable to install the 2021.10 lava-dispatcher version but able to install 2021.11 using "apt install lava-dispatcher" Is there any way to install the 2021.10 lava-dispatcher at this time? Or do we always need to install the latest versions? Regards, koti

3 years, 6 months

Re: [Lava-users] Lava-users Digest, Vol 39, Issue 11

by koti

Hi Nagerndra, I would recommend send a patch if the issue is resolved so that the LAVA team will review/check it. Regards, Koti On Thu, 25 Nov 2021 at 17:30, <lava-users-request(a)lists.lavasoftware.org> wrote: > Send Lava-users mailing list submissions to > lava-users(a)lists.lavasoftware.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.lavasoftware.org/mailman/listinfo/lava-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > lava-users-request(a)lists.lavasoftware.org > > You can reach the person managing the list at > lava-users-owner(a)lists.lavasoftware.org > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of Lava-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Constant failure_retry does not exist in the device > config 'constants' (Nagendra Singamsetti) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 18:02:59 +0530 > From: Nagendra Singamsetti <nag.singam91(a)gmail.com> > To: lava-users(a)lists.lavasoftware.org > Subject: Re: [Lava-users] Constant failure_retry does not exist in the > device config 'constants' > Message-ID: > <CAFhg_Wtt3+AnYRLLO7nm2u8uiYKLFPHaS7_Q5LKvah= > 0Z_vsSg(a)mail.gmail.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > > Hi All , > The Issue got solved by updating the latest change in base.jinja2 > device-type file. > > # Set the failure retry to default or override it failure_retry: {{ > failure_retry|default(1) }} # Override boot_retry boot_retry: {{ > boot_retry }}{% endblock constants -%} > > I am not sure why base.jinja2 is not updated during the 2021.10 > lava-server upgrade process. If any one got the same issue please try > this change. > > thanks > > Regards > > Nagendra S > > > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 1:19 PM Nagendra Singamsetti < > nag.singam91(a)gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I got struck with strange issue with latest version 2021.10 > > > > > > - *error_msg*: Constant failure_retry does not exist in the device > > config 'constants' section. > > - *error_type*: Configuration > > > > ConfigurationError: The LAVA instance is not configured correctly. Please > > report this error to LAVA admins. > > > > My setup is working fine with 2021.05. But after upgrading with the > latest > > version 2021.10 none of the jobs are not working. Always it raises the > > Exception called Configuration Error. > > > > Looking forward to your kind response!!! > > > > > > Regards > > Nagendra S > > > > > > >

3 years, 7 months

Constant failure_retry does not exist in the device config 'constants'

by Nagendra Singamsetti

Hi All, I got struck with strange issue with latest version 2021.10 - *error_msg*: Constant failure_retry does not exist in the device config 'constants' section. - *error_type*: Configuration ConfigurationError: The LAVA instance is not configured correctly. Please report this error to LAVA admins. My setup is working fine with 2021.05. But after upgrading with the latest version 2021.10 none of the jobs are not working. Always it raises the Exception called Configuration Error. Looking forward to your kind response!!! Regards Nagendra S

3 years, 7 months

API PUT call permissions

by Milosz Wasilewski

Hi, I'm running a project which requires changes in device status in LAVA. It will request the device to be put into 'maintenance' and later on into 'good' state. Initially I was using my personal API token. Since I was a superuser it all worked. A few weeks ago I tried to move to a more permanent solution with a dedicated user. I granted all required access rights to the new user, but PUT calls to api/v0.2/devices/<device_name> were rejected. After looking at the code it seems that only superuser is allowed to make such calls. Is there a reason for that? Changes were introduced in this commit: https://git.lavasoftware.org/lava/lava/-/commit/2bdbd462d745b45308faf86dd37… Best Regards, Milosz

3 years, 7 months

using 'uuu' boot action results in KeyError: 'uuu' on v2021.09

by Davis Roman

Hello, I received an error message when using the 'uuu' boot action on v2021.09. I tried poking around through the lava source but I'm still fairly new to the repo so I'm a bit stumped. Any comments or suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Davis Traceback (most recent call last): File "/bin/lava-run", line 240, in main job = parse_job_file(logger, options) File "/bin/lava-run", line 151, in parse_job_file env_dut=env_dut, File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/lava_dispatcher/parser.py", line 163, in parse test_counts[namespace], File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/lava_dispatcher/parser.py", line 47, in parse_action cls = Boot.select(device, parameters) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/lava_dispatcher/logical.py", line 276, in select res = c.accepts(device, parameters) File "/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/lava_dispatcher/actions/boot/uuu.py", line 119, in accepts params = device["actions"]["boot"]["methods"]["uuu"]["options"] KeyError: 'uuu' LAVABug: This is probably a bug in LAVA, please report it. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- device_type: imx8m job_name: flash with uuu timeouts: job: minutes: 10 action: minutes: 10 connection: minutes: 5 visibility: public actions: - deploy: to: uuu images: boot: url: file:///home/davis/uuu/imx-boot-64.bin system : url: file:///home/davis/uuu/sd.img - boot: method: uuu commands : - uuu: -b emmc_all {boot} {system}

3 years, 8 months

dispatcher docker image overwrites ENV

by Benedikt Braunger

Moin, I'm using https://git.lavasoftware.org/lava/pkg/docker-compose to build example setups with LAVA and I want to add a second remote worker. Therefore I set the URL and DC_DISPATCHER_HOSTNAME in .env and run `docker-compose up lava-dispatcher`. Sadly the dispatcher always tries to connect to "lava-server" dispite that the correct URL is passed via environment variables into the container. It looks like the value gets overwritten in https://git.lavasoftware.org/lava/lava/-/blob/master/docker/share/entrypoin… as the lava-worker file looks like this inside the container. ... # Logging level should be uppercase (DEBUG, INFO, WARN, ERROR) # LOGLEVEL="DEBUG" # Server connection URL="http://lava-server:8000/" # TOKEN="--token <token>" WS_URL="--ws-url http://lava-publisher:8001/ws/" After digging around a bit I found out, that this environment file comes from https://git.lavasoftware.org/lava/pkg/docker-compose/-/blob/master/overlays… This practically disables the possibility of configuring the worker via the .env of the docker-compose repo. The order of defaults loading in https://git.lavasoftware.org/lava/lava/-/blob/master/docker/share/entrypoin… should be changed, so that the importing from the lava-worker file happens first and the environment variable is applied afterwards. Overall there are two defaults here and two possibilities to configure the worker, which is a bit confusing and redundant. Imho the .env from the docker-compose repo is a known and established way of configuring containers and should be preferred. Regards, Beni -- Benedikt Braunger emlix GmbH, http://www.emlix.com Fon +49 551 30664-0, Fax +49 551 30664-11 Gothaer Platz 3, 37083 Goettingen, Germany Sitz der Gesellschaft: Goettingen, Amtsgericht Goettingen HR B 3160 Geschaeftsfuehrung: Heike Jordan, Dr. Uwe Kracke Ust-IdNr.: DE 205 198 055 emlix - smart embedded open source

3 years, 8 months

Parsing test result that include square brackets in interactive test

by 김서지

3 years, 8 months

All device become 'Bad (Invalid device configuration)' after lava server re-install

by Kever Yang

Hi I setup a LAVA server few years ago, on Debian 9.5 Stretch(with Python 3.5), and it works correctly. Recently I update the Python to 3.6, but the lava-server not able to work correctly. eg. the HTTP server does not work. So I fall back to Python 3.5 and re-install the LAVA server at the same time, but unfortunately the device does not work this time. The device status is set to "Bad (Invalid device configuration)" by the lava-health without any real check. The device was work correctly, and only change to 'BAD' when health check job get fail. Is there any device related option was set to mandatory instead of optional which cause this issue? How can I identify this issue? I can't see any Error in the log file at /var/log/lava-server Thanks, - Kever

3 years, 8 months

Can't I use ']' on bootloader_prompt and "$'\cc'" on interrupt_char?

by 김서지

3 years, 8 months

How to write dummy deploy action to test already flashed and booted DUT?

by 김서지

3 years, 9 months

← Newer
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
93
Older →

Jump to page:

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

lava-users